A fictional financial institution uses Summit on entity-resolution decisions in its sanctions-screening workflow. Names, figures, and outcomes are illustrative — this is a template, not a customer reference.
A borderline match with a transliterated name and conflicting DOB. A false accept freezes a legitimate payment; a false reject clears a sanctioned party. Either way, the decision must be defensible months later.
Summit bound the two records and the watchlist entry, ran the resolver agent, and applied policy entity_match.v7 (2 strong IDs required). Confidence 0.71 fell in the review band.
The decision escalated to a named reviewer, the payment was held, and a signed Decision Receipt captured it. Compliance later replayed it — MATCH. The institution can prove exactly what happened.
"We didn't just get an answer — we got something we could put in front of an examiner."